Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UNSW Vice-Chancellors

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to University of New South Wales#Vice-Chancellors. It appears the information is already located at the target article. Therefore, no merging is necessary. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 02:26, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

UNSW Vice-Chancellors

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In and of itself not notable. This information more appropriately belongs on the University of New South Wales page, where there is also context. Qwerty Binary (talk) 02:26, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or convert to category. If by some chance it's kept, rename to University of New South Wales Vice-Chancellors as per University of New South Wales and standard naming conventions. Stuartyeates (talk) 03:57, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:28, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:29, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:29, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:29, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to University of New South Wales, assuming some source can be found to validate the contents of the list. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 03:28, 15 August 2013 (UTC).[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 05:06, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to University of New South Wales as suggested above. I can't see Stuartyeates objecting to that either but I'll ping him in case he's not watching this. I think a merge is sensible. Stalwart111 13:13, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'd be happy with a merge, as User talk:Stalwart111 correctly guessed. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:23, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.