- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:37, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- USBCrypt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete Non-notable software. No independent sources given. Web search produced only the publisher's own sites and download sites selling the software. (Note: The article was created by a user with a name matching that of the publisher of this software.) JamesBWatson (talk) 08:13, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. No reliable sources found to confirm notability. --Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 12:35, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not seeing how this is notable. Lacks coverage.--RadioFan (talk) 12:39, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:50, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Same here. Joe Chill (talk) 23:23, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as article fails WP:N. There's nothing in the article that indicates notability. Armbrust Talk Contribs 00:22, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.