Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UTMC Development Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete as copyvio of http://www.utmc.gov.uk/udg/index.htm (per Google cache).  Sandstein  17:27, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

UTMC Development Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

non-notable working group of UK Department for Transport ninety:one 15:26, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 15:58, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 12:37, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep. Seems to be an important quasi-governmental agency. I found a few academic sources, but they seem to require registration and/or payment. 69.140.152.55 (talk) 03:32, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(not a government agency) ninety:one 19:22, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TerriersFan (talk) 15:38, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Singularity 02:34, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Firm keep. Genuine quango that does real work. Like many government spin-offs (e.g. UKTI) it has poor internet coverage and website, but is significant in its field. Aardvarkvarkvark (talk) 04:12, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.