- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep (no consensus). Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:01, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Appears to be a not-very-notable site with Alexa rank around 250,000. — ceejayoz ★ 15:28, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. — ceejayoz ★ 15:28, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. It's a very nice site though, I've been browsing it from time to time and they have great stuff. — mark ✎ 15:38, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep/Expand they have notable partners "WFMU, PennSound, The Center for Literary Computing, and Artmob" and host a fair amount of original content. It's well known in poetics circles and their outsiders section is particulary well-linked/respected. Jessamyn 15:42, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep/Expand as above. Very notable website and worthy of an article. Just curious, is there a Wikipolicy that demands a site get a certain Alexa rating in order to be eligible for an article? I'm not aware of such a rule, myself. 23skidoo 04:33, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as above. --Jacquelyn Marie 16:05, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.