- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 03:36, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as it violates the "Wikipedia is not a crystal ball" policy, and is entirely non-notable besides that. The creator of the "language" is also the one who made the article. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 04:26, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not sure about crystal ball, but it violates a lot of other policies (WP:RS, WP:NFT, the list goes on and on) Hobbeslover talk/contribs 04:28, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. The language is not yet complete, hence the crystal ball. But yes, those all work too :) -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 04:29, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom.--Peta 06:23, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Vidim Delete Muc ... hey, it's not a completely useless language. RGTraynor 06:25, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom Trebor 11:47, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, as 76 g.hits for a language with website is extremely low. CP/M 22:54, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete → Wombdpsw - @ ← 02:27, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.