- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Deleted and redirected to Modernism. (aeropagitica) (talk) 10:11, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Page is original research, neologism best reffered to in modernism. Zepheus (ツィフィアス) 19:30, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I wouldn't call it a neologism, I've heard it in use (in reference to industrial design) for a good long time. The article as it stands is something different and close to nonsense ("Ultramodernity is closely affiliated with Radness.") Okay then. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 20:02, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, looks very much like original research unless author can come up with some good outside sources. Recury 20:45, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:OR at best, or more likely WP:NFT -- Whpq 21:41, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless the author or other interested editor can quote references and cite sources for the research. If so,cleanup, as the tone of the article is non-encyclopedic. (aeropagitica) (talk) 21:42, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and redirect to modernism. OR and neologism (with various sources, but none identifiable as the fountain source as far as I can tell) Just zis Guy you know? 00:10, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.