- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:45, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Ultranomicon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Patently nonnotable band (WP:MUSIC), but the article asserts notability, so I'm declining a speedy and bringing it here. Sandstein 11:46, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I see no sourced assertion of notability. Óðinn (talk) 12:02, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: This article is one guy having fun. I also agree that there is no assertion of notability. I don't think 'well-known' qualifies as an assertion. Fails BAND anyway. Law shoot! 17:00, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Most of the article was hoax material, and the assertion of notability was unsourced OR (which may also have been hoax). After I deleted most of that, the article is even more terrible than it was before. —Politizer talk/contribs 17:26, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- LOL. In effect you're saying your edits made the article worse. :P Law shoot! 17:55, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Yep :-D —Politizer talk/contribs 18:07, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:BAND rules. DreamGuy (talk) 18:45, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 23:36, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.