Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ultraviolet Sound

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 23:44, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ultraviolet Sound (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Fails WP:MUSIC roux   07:04, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Per nom. New band with no assertions of notability yet. --OliverTwisted ^(Talk) (Stuff) 07:33, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I know notability generally is not inherited but Sarah Hudson (singer) says that this here ultraviolet thingy is actually herself an a bunch of guys. I would offer that if she is notable enough for her own BLP, then her band is too, in particular if its a vehicle as it seems (in other words, she is ceasing to sing solo and will lead the band). If we delete this, then why keep her around? I am for keep if we keep her article, but for delete if we feel it deserves an AfD of its own. Please respond... Thanks!--Cerejota (talk) 10:33, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Fails WP:BAND notability requirements. Jo7hs2 (talk) 21:32, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.