Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ulysses Learning
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 01:33, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Ulysses Learning (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Tagged for notability since July 2009, the page currently has one incoming Wikilink and contains much product information. Google search reveals 7,590 links, most of which beyond page3 are blog entries and commentaries. Can not substantiate reasons for notability, hence proposed for deletion Trident13 (talk) 16:03, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:20, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Promotional to the border of unintelligibility: The CallMentor Learning and Performance Improvement System features: four simulation-based e-Learning programs; group-facilitated exercises; coaching methods and processes; and performance improvement services - implementation consulting, performance measurement, Master Coach and Facilitator Certification, and certified IT installation and support along with a Learning and Administrative Management System... I reckon what this means in English is that they train people who work in call centers. No indication that this business has any kind of historical, technical, or cultural importance. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 17:17, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable company. Google provides no information except that the company has one ___location and 17 employees.[1] --MelanieN (talk) 23:59, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.