Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unblu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 03:58, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unblu

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Unblu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NORG and lacks evidence of WP:SUSTAINED notability backed up by WP:RS. Amigao (talk) 01:31, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Entirely lacks WP:INDEPENDENT sources - all 22 are either press releases or short descriptions from affiliate websites. Tvfunhouse (talk) 03:45, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Comment: The current article and its sources are absolutely garbage, but secondary sources do exist. [1][2][3] Gonna do some more research before !voting though – if I can find the time I'd like to improve the article too. Toadspike [Talk] 17:55, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Companies, Software, and Switzerland. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:04, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Fails WP:NCORP. Gheus (talk) 09:11, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.