Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UnboundID

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:49, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

UnboundID

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

My extensive PROD was removed with the sole basis of the IP misunderstanding what "PR environment" means therefore this PROD still applies and there's nothing suggesting any actual notability for this company since, like my PROD stated, all of this is simply trivial and unconvincing PR, no actual substance, and it's clear the company had activities with this advertisement article itself. SwisterTwister talk 23:29, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:30, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete no RSes providing WP:CORPDEPTH - RS coverage appears to be funding rounds - David Gerard (talk) 10:52, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as corporate spam on a company that was unremarkable either before or since its acquisition. K.e.coffman (talk) 09:19, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.