Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Underdifferentiation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splash^talk 00:44, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Definition of an infrequently used word, which rarely has this meaning, if Google is any indication. -- Kjkolb 11:54, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Per nom. --StuffOfInterest 14:41, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delete per nominator. Stifle 22:59, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.