Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Understanding insomnia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 23:59, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Understanding insomnia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Redundant to insomnia. HaeB (talk) 09:44, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as Wikipedia is not an instructional manual, and does not offer medical advice. Kevin (talk) 10:51, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - redundant, unsourced, poorly-written article. -- JediLofty ^{User ¦ Talk} 11:01, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - poorly written, no references; redundant to both insomnia and sleep hygiene --Anonymaus (talk) 11:08, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete -redundant. --Eleassar ^{my talk} 12:45, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Speedy would be more appropriate. Tenacious D Fan (talk) 13:19, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. ukexpat (talk) 14:02, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - we already have insomnia --T-rex 15:45, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete (and merge salvagable content to insomnia), per Kevin. --Cameron (T|C) 17:34, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Maxamegalon2000 17:35, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.