- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 04:34, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- UniIRC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Is this notable? Is this advertising? Is the list of links into various chatrooms on this IRC services appropriate? Largo Plazo (talk) 11:45, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable, unverifiable via significant coverage in reliable 3rd party sourcing, advertisement, and not a directory/webhost/etc. Jasynnash2 (talk) 12:06, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, article about an online chat service that contains no prima facie case for notability. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:03, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Piling on with "no third party reliable sources to verify notability" type comment. --Quartermaster (talk) 16:23, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no real source. abf /talk to me/ 16:59, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:07, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.