- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. howcheng {chat} 16:46, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
NN wiki. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 02:02, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Not just a wiki. Also a website, which looks fairly significant in its field. Nearly 3,000 forum members, which isn't bad for an academic site. CalJW 03:08, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep maybe not NN. -- JJay 03:16, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Does not meet WP:WEB in any way. Agnte 17:00, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep' Notability is not official Wikipedia policy, merely a guideline by which some but by no means all Wikipedians operate. The site exists and is verifiable. Jcuk 21:46, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. nn. mikka (t) 23:42, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep UniLang is most known for its forum. Its wiki may not be notable enough for an article but this isn't about the wiki this is about the UniLang site as a whole (the forum, the main site, the wiki). The UniLang forum has 2949 members which is notable for a forum. --Revolución (talk) 04:56, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. It appears to be notable enough for inclusion, based upon my reading of WP:WEB. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 08:18, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Seems pretty prominent, considering the subject matter. -Colin Kimbrell 22:21, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.