Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unicorn Skeleton Mask

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Omar Rodríguez-López discography. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:29, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unicorn Skeleton Mask

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Looking at a Google search I did not find anything under News or Books. Also, the web search netted very few results and nothing related from an independent and reliable source. As such under WP:ALBUM this content does not warrant a standalone article and should be merged into Omar Rodríguez-López discography. This could also be a multiple article nomination as it seems he has an article for every album of which most are about as filled though I haven't performed WP:BEFORE on any of them. Mkdw ^talk 06:15, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 17:40, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Theopolisme (talk) 01:05, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Omar Rodríguez-López discography as a plausible search term, but an individual page does not seem warranted as I'm not finding significant coverage for this album; just personal/social networking sites, blog/forum posts, and torrent file links. This release does not appear to meet WP:NALBUMS. Gong show 23:42, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Seems to have missed out on most attention as it was something of a surprise album released almost simultaneously with two others. That said, keep as it's still a full-length studio album by a notable artist and there's little reason to have articles on all their other albums but not this one. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 06:00, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Completely setting aside WP:NALBUM, saying the band has other album articles so this one should be kept is an argument to avoid in deletion discussions. There could be so many possible reasons for that including the fact which you mention in that this album received less attention. Mkdw ^talk 05:21, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:16, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect as above. If it later receives critical attention the article can be recovered, but at the moment it's not notable, and we don't know for sure that it will be notable. Even Woman Gives Birth To Tomato! currently fails to demonstrate notability, so we can hardly assume all his albums are automatically notable. Even some much bigger artists have non-notable albums (Cliff Richard comes to mind). --Colapeninsula (talk) 17:15, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect, for same reasons as above, does not appear to meet WP:GNG yet, but creating the redirect will mean that the term does remain searchable within Wikipedia and provides a possibility to expand if and when it does become notable.—Baldy Bill (talk) 14:38, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.