- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:26, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Unilateration (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Neologism or possibly just incoherent summary of a subject which has no real sources. Googling for the name or anything related to RTLS specific to the terms in the article just gives wikipedia and mirrors. the article was originally PRODed but it was contested. Protonk (talk) 00:46, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable. I found it used as a technical term in a handful of articles on Google Scholar, but these don't seem to discuss the concept itself as a topic. No references have been provided to reliable sources. Cullen328 (talk) 01:11, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:44, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Knovel.com can't find anything with this keyword. IEEE Explore can't find anything in 2,866,227 documents (no hits at all in two tries, and I cut and pasted the word to make sure I was spelling it correctly).( There are 1704 hits on Explore for "real time locating system", though...it's not like IEEE is ignoring this topic, but the term just isn't used by people writing about RTLS) --Wtshymanski (talk) 15:07, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.