Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unintelligent Design Theory

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 23:25, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

An unencyclopedic joke - or, if you prefer, original "research". CDC 17:27, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Or move to BJAODN. The title is funny, but the article is lame. | Keithlaw 17:30, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete BJAODN worthy. If the authors worked on it a bit, they could submit it to Uncyclopedia. Capitalistroadster 17:49, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Uncyclopedia already has Unintelligent Design, Intelligent design, Stupid Design, Intelligent Design By Committee, New Intelligent Design, and Swiss government. Uncle G 18:45, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Perhaps we need bad titles and other deleted nonsense, because as Keithlaw said, it's kinda a crummy article. Delete as crummy joke. Lord Bob 17:53, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. Note to its author: keep the day job. PJM 18:59, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete (rather un-)original "research" Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] (W) AfD? 20:57, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as original "research". Another Department of Daftness contribution. — RJH 21:02, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• True, too true. Too bad it's OR. Delete Denni ☯ 04:51, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete OR abakharev 05:26, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.