- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Coredesat 02:09, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
So many reasons. Plot summary of unnamed, unpublished science fiction; article created by the author. Clarityfiend 20:23, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Good Lord, delete WP:NOT#INFO, non-notable, no reliable sources, possible crystalballing, and probably a whole laundry list of others I'm forgetting.--Ispy1981 20:36, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete. Non-notable, WP:CRYSTAL, no reliable sources and sounds like fancruft. Escape Artist Swyer | Talk to me | Articles touched by my noodly appendage 21:37, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete; classic crystal-balling. Come back when it's published, reviewed, and on the best-seller list, thanks. Tony Fox (arf!) review? 22:55, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this would deleted even if this were published. --Haemo 02:43, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No references, no attempt at all made at demonstrating note, grossly inadequate context explains nothing surrounding the book - Why was there ever a link to the Halo website in its extlinks? MrZaiustalk 20:46, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 05:27, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.