- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep Eluchil404 01:51, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It reads as an advertisement and seems to fall into WP:OR otherwise. Gay Cdn 20:14, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, ad. --ColourBurst 23:31, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Agresso is a large and well-known company - refer to WP:Corp. The article needs extensive cleanup though as it currently reads as an advertisement. --Sleepyhead 09:39, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I have made some changes to the article to make it more encyclopedic. --Sleepyhead 09:46, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. As per nomination. Catherine breillat 23:55, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The company seems to have a turnover of 275 mil. €, a market capitalisation of 413 mil € and is part of several indices. For me it seems to fulfill WP:CORP and after Sleepyheads edit it's no more an ad than many other articles in that field. --S.K. 15:28, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Deathphoenix ʕ 17:40, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Appears to meet WP:CORP. (Move to Agresso, which seems to be the official name of the company.) — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 23:34, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per SK. Stifle (talk) 19:49, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.