Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unity Capital

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 17:23, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unity Capital

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an interesting one because although I considered simply speedying this, I think it needs a nomination because this article has stayed since November 2006 after being started by its founder and my searches simply found nothing better than some links here and the current version is simply unacceptable. SwisterTwister talk 07:24, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:27, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:27, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:42, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Indications are that the firm's founder now works elsewhere [1] and Unity Capital Partners Llp appears to no longer exist. Searches are locating nothing to indicate the firm meets WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 06:37, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as per SwisterTwister and AllyD. Searches turn up hits, but all trivial. Fails WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:38, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.