Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unity Primary School
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Singularity 06:41, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Unity Primary School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
I originally prodded this article with the reason: "No evidence of notability, no references, and frankly very little substantive information at all, other than that which would be better suited to a school mission statement." The article's creator removed the prod with no reason - I'm assuming that means they contest it. Although information has been added to the article, my reason for deletion remains the same: this is a primary school, and although their aims may be very laudable, there is no evidence or assertion of notability. Additionally, the article is written in a very non-neutral point of view, and I suspect the author may have a conflict of interest (I know these are not reasons for deletion in themselves). I think previous debates have decided that primary schools are not inherently notable. kateshortforbob 12:12, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The school does not have any widespread recognition, no recognizeable widespread accomplishments, no notable alumni, or anything of the sort, and therefore has no established notability. Also, take note that the text comes directly from the school's website. Calgary 13:03, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Copyvio, conflict of interest, spam, POV... but most importantly, notability not established. Eliz81(talk)(contribs) 14:10, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no WP:N or WP:RS. Reads like an ad, and is WP:SPAM. Delete. Nenyedi • (Deeds•Talk) 16:35, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete in lack of references Corpx 16:41, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Spam, COI. ¿SFGiДnts! ¿Complain! ¿Analyze! ¿Review! 20:38, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.