Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Universal Image Format
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep; this nomination is the result of a content dispute (whether the article should be centered on the IETF standard or the or the MagicISO format); the talk page is the place for content discussions. Tizio 16:45, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Universal Image Format (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
This "standard" is in fact a small part of a draft standard called IPP-Fax, which was abandoned in 2004. In addition, UIF was not in the latest draft (ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/QUALDOCS/wd-ifx10-latest.pdf) of the standard, having been replaced by PDFax and then PDF/is. It appears in only two sets of slides from prceedings of the PWG and does not occur in any of IETFs current proposed or accepted standards and is clearly not notable. Jamesmusik 23:33, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Rejected standard that has never been used in practice. -- intgr #%@! 23:43, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Referenced disambiguation page. — RevRagnarok Talk Contrib 23:46, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and Rework: In light of the standard having been superseded, I think that providing enough verifiable information can be found, the article should be reworked (as suggested) to focus more on the disk image format – while being careful to avoid coming too close to advertising, which was an issue previously. —GrimRevenant 04:51, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Is there any evidence of the notability of this format? -- intgr #%@! 06:08, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.