Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unreal Tournament 2003

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. WP:BEFORE. Notability is not based on article quality; clear consensus that sufficient sourcing exists for WP:GNG. (non-admin closure) — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 11:42, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unreal Tournament 2003

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly referenced article about a video game, with no strong claim of notability per WP:VG/S. Hakken (talk) 17:53, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. All the other Unreal games are on Wikipedia. Evercat (talk) 22:30, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - "all the other Unreal games are on Wikipedia" is not a valid reason, but this game has been covered by many RSs and easily meets the GNG - just take a look at the critic reviews listed on Metacritic, for instance.--IDV^talk 09:48, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. the recent deletion requests just let me speechless... Shaddim (talk) 10:22, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Not sure if nominator @Hakken is familiar with WP:VG guidelines, but this is clearly a notable game by Wikipedia's standards. By the time they nominated it for deletion, it already used GameSpot, IGN and PC Gamer as references. Article can certainly be improved, but it is notable undoubtedly. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 11:11, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.