Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Untitled Batman Project

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 03:02, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled Batman Project

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is unsourced, and consists largely of speculation. RadManCF (talk) 16:23, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I agree. Too speculative at this point; the info here is better suited for a fansite. DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 16:39, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per WP:CRYSTAL. Joe Chill (talk) 16:40, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nothing but rumors and speculation. I don't think this supposed movie has even been confirmed (yet alone started pre-production already). TJ Spyke 16:45, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:34, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and Salt the earth, also create protect all of the titles listed on this page. Darrenhusted (talk) 17:36, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- For the record Knightfall, Gotham City, The Dark Knight Returns and The Caped Crusader are already pages or redirects, but I would suggest all four with (film) should be protected, along with The Shadow of the Bat and The Legend of Batman. User:Miki123456 has also created Terminator 5 and Spider-man reboot pages, they are either a time-traveller or just have an obsession with making edits concerning future films. Darrenhusted (talk) 18:21, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, completely fails WP:NFF and WP:CRYSTAL, and Wikipedia is not a rumor mill which is all this article contains. Also agree with Darrenhusted's to salt it and all speculated titles. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 17:39, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for all reasons stated above. Particularly the title which is both temporary in nature and unspecific, it could also be a comic project, an animated series, a game, etc. Anything can be an "untitled project".--70.80.234.196 (talk) 18:08, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Completely unsourced speculation. --Michig (talk) 18:37, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per WP:CRYSTAL -- RP459 ^Talk/_{Contributions} 18:39, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete without prejudice toward recreation. The project is getting some "buzz" [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]... but not quite enough in reliable sources to meet WP:CRYSTAL. No need to SALT, as considering the money filmmakers have made on the sequels, it is more likley than not that the project will continue. Wikipedia can afford to be patient, and need not be bitey. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 00:01, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per WP:CRYSTAL. Warrah (talk) 00:03, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per 70.80.234.196 and WP:HAMMER, projects are almost (but not quite) never notable before a working title is leaked to the press. If/when this is farther along an article will certainly be appropriate, but not now. Eluchil404 (talk) 08:04, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.