Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Untitled Vishnuvardhan Project

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 16:33, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled Vishnuvardhan Project (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:CRYSTAL, WP:HAMMER, pure speculation and only sourced to film gossip blogs. CaptainScreebo ^Parley! 13:04, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• The project is going to start next week so no need to delete this page. Nothing is gossip here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeevanantham Karunanithi (talk • contribs) 2012-05-10T15:08:03‎
  • The initialism gibberish written in the nomination is referring to Wikipedia is not a crystal ball and TenPoundHammer's Law. Uncle G (talk) 16:25, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • FFS, I have linked them now, they are not initialisms but shortcuts to relevant policy, thanks for your add though, GTG ;-) CaptainScreebo ^Parley! 17:21, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect for now per WP:TOO SOON and, as sources are referring to it as the "Untitled Vishnuvardhan Project" (not as "unlikely" search term), we can send readers, per policy, to Vishnuvardhan (director)#Upcoming film... the one place where policy allows that it makes sense to have this written about until such time as the topic is ready for its own article. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 06:16, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• The film will go on floors on May 31 for first schedule in mumbai. Confirmed news from media. So no need to delete this page.Jeevanantham Karunanithi (Talk) 5:31, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

  Not to quibble... as I am always wiling to reverse my stance... but for Indian films the term "going on the floor" is usually used for the official announcement that signals true pre-production, consisting of an announcement party, blessing, and festivities... and often a pre-release of the proposed film's planned music tracks. Can you offer a reliable source that tells us that principal filming will actually begin on May 31st? Thanks, Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 00:16, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Refer filming section in the article.Jeevanantham Karunanithi (Talk) 5:31, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
  • I've read both the sources provided for that section. Behindwoods has the sentence "will go on floors in Mumbai on the 31st of this month" and Indiaglitz has the sentence "The latest is that the film will go on floors in Mumbai on May 31 for the first schedule". As above, it is the term "go on floors" that I question, as the term does not indicate principle filming will begin on those projected dates... which is why I asked for something a little more definitive. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 15:58, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect: Per WP:NFF -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 18:37, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.