- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Flowerparty☀ 00:29, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Unus Framework (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No Google News hits, no coverage, nothing in the article that even indicates that the product might be notable. I declined the speedy as A7 does not cover software (not even such that usually runs on web servers as it's neither web content nor web sites) but nevertheless this is probably not notable at all. Regards SoWhy 20:46, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —KuyaBriBriTalk 21:11, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No reliable sources found to verify notability. TheLeftorium 21:37, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no reliable sources available, not notable. A new name 2008 (talk) 22:49, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Demonstrates a problem in new article patrolling: if I fart and write an article about the expanding mass of gas, it needs to be debated as to its notability. Because there is no speedy category for general stuff of no notability of whatsoever. Your typical case is words made up by kids; tons of those. And PHP scripts; lots of this unverifiable non-notable garbage is kept because it's just too much work to prod 'em, wait for the deprod, then bring them up for a multi-day discussion. Most crap like this just gets kept by default. Rule stickler admins with "non-notable bands can be deleted, but not software, and not farts" attitude are not particularly helpful. Common, but not helpful. 62.78.198.48 (talk) 18:26, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- (Comment by creator originally posted to this debate's talk page) -
- I greatly appreciate the constructive criticism of the moderation for Wikipedia now.
- Also just to educate you on the difference between what you are calling a "PHP Script" this is not written by your average 16 year-old protégé posting the newest twitter project. It evolves months of planning, development, testing, debugging etc with highly complex development design theories and logic algorithms that would run circles around a "PHP Script".
- Wither this gets deleted or not this is the first and last article I will ever contribute to Wikipedia, Thanks for the great support!
- Cheers
- Nwhitingx (talk) 19:26, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Subject software package has just been released after development by single developer. No evidence of uptake. No other evidence of notability. Article appears to be written by sole developer of the software. Paleking (talk) 22:22, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.