Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Upkeep Maintenance Management

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:32, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Upkeep Maintenance Management

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NCORP notable WP:CORPDEPTH. Mostly routine stuff including churnalism. nothing of interest found in a before search Dom from Paris (talk) 12:14, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 12:15, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 12:15, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this obvious undisclosed native advertising. MER-C 14:46, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom, and it is irritating when they do it with links and some "sources", makes it ineligible for A7 and they wrote in a way that escapes G11. --Quek157 (talk) 19:54, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non-notable, fails WP:NCORP.--SamHolt6 (talk) 04:21, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.