Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Upper crust (idiom)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Rlendog (talk) 21:30, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Upper crust (idiom) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Dicdef Spartaz Humbug! 03:59, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:17, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete- Single source dicdef. Direct link to Wiktionary entry 'upper crust' already available at Upper crust, a valid & easy to find disambiguation page for anyone looking for the term here. Dru of Id (talk) 06:09, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Wikipedia is not a dictionary. SL93 (talk) 21:30, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:WINAD. --SupernovaExplosion (talk) 13:15, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 13:58, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 13:58, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.