Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Upsilon phi delta
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. -Splashtalk 00:00, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
By its own admission, this is a local sorority started in 1993. Generally, local organizations aren't kept without some claim to notability, of which I see little. Maybe merge to parent organization, if there is one, but I am not sure what content is worth it. Xoloz 19:53, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge some of this to Ursinus College, which could use some more text. -- JJay 20:31, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete content would stick out awkwardly on the Ursinus College article. The sororities listed here are by contrast major organizations. Endomion 23:10, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This is a local sorority for this College. Isn't that more important than the major organizations? -- JJay 23:28, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Imagine a five-paragraph article for a high school, with a sixth paragraph just about the chess club at that school. That's what I mean by sticking out. Endomion 02:03, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- We have lots of articles like that. -- JJay 02:14, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Are you advocating two wrongs make a right? --Apostrophe 05:22, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm advocating saving some information on this very important group of Ursinus College scholars. -- JJay 05:49, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- "very important"? Your comment above doesn't quite support the position of "saving some information", either way. --Apostrophe 01:52, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I have no real stake in this discussion, but I do find "very important group of... scholars" to be a questionable characterization. The article gives no evidence they are of scholarly note. Xoloz 17:01, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- All students are scholars. What else would they be doing at college? -- JJay 21:02, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- LOL :) That was ironic, right? ;) Xoloz 01:50, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- We have lots of articles like that. -- JJay 02:14, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. --Apostrophe 01:52, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. - NeoJustin 05:38, December 27, 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.