- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Owen× ☎ 19:25, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Upwardly Global (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Promotional company article propped up by primary sources, press releases, role accounts, etc. No real evidence of notability * Pppery * it has begun... 18:50, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:53, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:53, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - entirely promotional article, cannot see how or even why this article could be salvaged. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 19:43, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. On top of the sources, there also appears to be an SPA affiliated with the company. Surayeproject3 (talk) 02:11, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- Delete - Unless someone can point out the WP:THREE, I cannot see anything meeting WP:ORGCRIT. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:08, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: The article lacks significant independent, in-depth coverage from reliable sources. Does not meet WP:GNG. Z3r0h3r000 (talk) 11:49, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.