Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ureme 8

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 23:19, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ureme 8

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Ureme 8 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable, nothing shows up in searches to establish notability except databases and other wikis. Tagged for notability for over a year. Donaldd23 (talk) 22:52, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 22:52, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 22:52, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Unsourced, does not establish notability or significance. Aasim 08:00, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Generally per nom, nothing could be found except other wikis and databases. There is no coverage in multiple significant reliable independent sources to meet the WP:GNG. --Danre98^{(talk^contribs)} 16:30, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.