Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Use-Case Responsibility Driven Analysis and Design
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. -Doc ask? 11:19, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Seems to me not to be notable enought to have an onw article →AzaToth 11:06, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep because the question here isn't notability. This is a fairly narrow subject which may be very notable in its field. The question, however, is "Wikipedia is not a how-to guide" and whether it voilates that. Roodog2k 14:19, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, the concept appears to have been invented by the main author of the article. I haven't found it on any website except for his company, a submission to a journal (it is not clear if it was accepted or published) and sites that use Wikipedia content. If proof of outside usage can be given, I would consider keeping the article. -- Kjkolb 14:49, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Kjkolb's comment. Cedars 16:12, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Advertisment. This is the existing practice in software design, just with a fancier name. Peter Grey 18:08, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOR, among other things. Stifle (talk) 23:23, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. GfloresTalk 05:48, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.