- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete both per WP:NN. --Selket Talk 04:27, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Use Case Maker (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Orphaned article of questionable notability. Cordless Larry (talk) 07:54, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I am also nominating the following related page:
- Use Case Studio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Cordless Larry (talk) 07:59, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete (both) - seem to be a non-notable pieces of software. And an article that only list it's capabilities is simply advertising. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yobmod (talk • contribs) 12:00, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Both strong delete Basically spam which does not prove notability. treelo talk 19:16, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I created the Use Case Maker (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) article. I agree with deletion proposal. I'm going to convert existing link (see List of UML tools) into an external one. Theriderofrohan (talk) 09:23, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:34, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.