- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 04:59, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- Uv-mon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No significance in my opinion .... Brownbarons (talk) 16:24, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - I have to agree that it fails WP:N and appears that it has been found by a bot to have copyvio issues as well. Speedy delete perhaps? - Pmedema (talk) 19:40, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete: Another EU Seventh Framework Programme project whose charter has been published here. The existence of a project is not evidence of notability in itself. In this case the project has concluded, without evidence of impact on the world around us. AllyD (talk) 21:49, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:00, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:00, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:00, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.