Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/V/Vm Test Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to V/Vm#V/Vm Test Records. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) (talk) 15:32, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

V/Vm Test Records

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

V/Vm Test Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominated by anon IP as: Non-notable record label, complete lack of sources and very little news coverage. Only two of the artists mentioned in the article mention V/Vm Test Records on their page, one of these artists is V/Vm himself. Violates WP:GNG. User:74.108.22.119. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:05, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Companies, and United Kingdom. UtherSRG (talk) 14:05, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:21, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete or merge into V/Vm#V/Vm Test Records. ApexParagon (talk) 19:35, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into V/Vm § V/Vm Test Records, but selectively – without independent sources, statements like V/Vm Test Records were notable for their rebellious approach should be left behind. jlwoodwa (talk) 00:57, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• A clear merge candidate. This didn't need to come to AfD. Chubbles (talk) 13:49, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.