Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/V415 Muscae

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 14:27, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

V415 Muscae

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

V415 Muscae (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NASTRO. It is hard work finding anything published on this object, just a few discovery announcements. Expanding beyond the current two short sentences is going to be very difficult. Lithopsian (talk) 16:29, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Lithopsian (talk) 16:29, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: With the increasing number of high cadence all-sky survey projects, countless faint (not visible to the naked eye) novae and supernovae will be discovered. We don't need Wikipedia articles for each one. PopePompus (talk) 16:37, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: non-notable. The SIMBAD entry shows the discovery notice and not much else.[1] Praemonitus (talk) 20:43, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.