Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VIDA Select (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. (non-admin closure) Left guide (talk) 18:15, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

VIDA Select

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/VIDA Select
• Articles for deletion/VIDA Select (2nd nomination)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

VIDA Select (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability demonstrated. Most of the sources have passing mentions and do not refer to the topic directly. JohnMizuki (talk) 18:42, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Internet, and Georgia (U.S. state). Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:54, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:24, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Sources in the article are enough for SIGCOV (GQ and Quartz articles are fairly solid). The article does have a promotional tone, especially the "Services" section, and needs to be trimmed down. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 12:39, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Looks like quite a few sources since the last Afd such as this which meet WP:CORPDEPTH. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:50, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Improved since last AfD. Now the subject passes WP:GNG. Iljhgtn (talk) 01:42, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Appears to pass WP:ORGCRIT. Without a WP:SIRS table analysis demonstrating otherwise I can't support deleting this.4meter4 (talk) 15:52, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.