- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 01:46, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable. Advert BennyD 20:54, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete This is def. a non controversial issue. It should be speedy ready! Lsjzl 20:55, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per above. New article, nonsense, advertising. --Coredesat 21:17, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete it is not a speedy, it stresses it's importance. It's not nonsense, it's pretty clear. However, it is blatant advertising, which violates WP:NOT which really isn't a speedy. But a delete, none the less. Yanksox (talk) 21:25, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Wikibout-Talk to me! 23:19, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Spam. I would have put a speedy deletion tag up on this article myself if spam was included in WP:CSD. Sadly, spam is not a speedy deletion criterion at this time. Jesse Viviano 00:49, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.