Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VMerken

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was SPEEDY DELETE. JIP | Talk 10:24, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is just some guy who's good at Resident Evil 4. There's thousands of doom speedrunners that don't have articles, just because he's made a guide or two doesn't make him notable. A Clown in the Dark 02:17, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, non-notable, obvious vanity, fails WP:BIO --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 02:25, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete per nom. Video game player. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 02:48, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Aye, doesn't appear to have yet established notability per the guideline for inclusion of humans. Perhaps when/if he gets picked up by a publisher or is featured in Wired. - brenneman^{L} 04:34, 23 March 2006 (UTC) Not saying "delete" in bold since it's not a vote and my opinon is clear.[reply]
• Speedy delete a7, no claims of notability. --Rory096 05:08, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete per Rory. Bucketsofg 05:31, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy. I've deleted it now per CSD A7, non-notable. Restored it, now. Advised better to let AFD run its course. :)Gflores ^Talk 05:47, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedying articles on AfD that meet the criteria is common practice. Is there some other reason to wait? -- Kjkolb 07:15, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Because this isn't an article that meets the criterion. There are claims to notability, albiet weak ones. Almost certainly a moot point, but there is no reason to hurry, and always best to err on the side of caution. - brenneman^{L} 07:50, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.