Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Value-Centered Management

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 01:58, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

nn neologism and appears to be {{advert}}. Possible WP:COPYVIO issues (compare first paragraph to website) and probably does not meet WP:CORP. "Value-Centered Management" gets 658 ghits. Agent 86 03:00, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Most Google hits seem to be about a different thing called "Value Centered Management", a higher-education cousin of TQM. I can find no news articles about this version of Value-Centered Management, and searches including "Value-Centered Management" with "Parker" or "Stellar" (the creator and his company) yield no relevant hits except self-published ones. --William Pietri 03:58, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per nom Scented Guano 04:53, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, fails WP:NEO and WP:CORP, advertisement. Borderline copyvio, as the article is pretty much bits and pieces from the website, rearranged. --Coredesat 07:32, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per William Pietri. Paddles ^T_C 13:24, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Vehement delete. Valueless, and there's too much of this kind of crap going around:

Value-Centered Management is based on the belief that your must first identify and understand what your customers define as value and provide that value to them at all times.

The great thing about this "business philosophy" is that you probably could have thought it up yourself in, maybe, thirty seconds?

Your entire organization should only do things that bring value to your customers.

As opposed to thinking up rubbish like this? Smerdis of Tlön 18:53, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete We99 23:09, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. —Khoikhoi 03:56, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.