Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vanderanese language
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JForget 01:01, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Vanderanese language (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Failed prod, but the article most certainly needs to go. It has no references and no evidence to assert notability. Irbisgreif (talk) 22:19, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOT. Wikipedia is not for something you made up in school one day. (My favorite of all the "nots"!) --Gimme danger (talk) 03:23, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I only saved it from speedy because when I first looked, the writing seemed to indicate a semi-sophisticated knowledge of linguistics. I'm pretty sure I was wrong. Irbisgreif (talk) 03:32, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per WP:MADEUP. WuhWuzDat 03:35, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:MADEUP. ThemFromSpace 03:46, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Wp:NFT. I might have fallen for it, if it wasn't for all the "will be"s in the article, including my particular favourite, "Vanderanese is created by Vander Eubanks, who will become a famous person". DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 10:07, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The description reads like a description of Smurf language; in this one, simple monosyllables starting in 'V' are sprinkled around the same way that Smurfs randomly substitute 'smurf' for various nouns, verbs, and adjectives. Made up, original research, non-notable et cetera. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 16:46, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per everyone. Edward321 (talk) 14:41, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. When Vander Eubanks does become a famous person (I'm thinking GOP nomination in '44), it will not be as a result of this. Mandsford (talk) 18:33, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. —Cnilep (talk) 21:04, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as made-up. Due to good faith mistakes in changing the format of the PROD and PROD2 tags, PROD was seconded by three different editors. See Talk:Vanderanese language. Cnilep (talk) 21:08, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.