Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vantana Row

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. From the AFD nomination onward a couple of sources were added to the article, but they were either passing mentions, not-reliable or primary. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 21:43, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vantana Row

Vantana Row (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

nothing close to notability here. fails WP:NMUSIC and WP:GNG. Altho it isn't a reason for deletion, it is not clear whether the author is talking about members of the group, the group or other groups that they have performed with. The ONLY reliable sources currently on the article do not even mention the groups name John from Idegon (talk) 07:49, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Altho it isn't a reason for deletion, it is not clear whether the author is talking about members of the group, the group or other groups that they have performed with."

You are correct. As for your comment, I will clarify specific links of the referenced websites and clarify the subjects of each individual fact.

Creating the page has been an anticipatory act for the public's curiosity on the bio of what Volly Terry and Jamey Blaze's new band is doing and what it has achieved so far. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michaellastname (talk • contribs) 08:07, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Guess I should add WP:CRYSTAL to my nomination then. John from Idegon (talk) 08:16, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• • They have articles I just need to look more up to satisfy this petition. Thank you, John for the check. This article will be sufficiently informative after this trial period. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michaellastname (talk • contribs) 08:48, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • Michaellastname: Please read WP:PGL, like the note at the top of the editmode of this page instructs, and also I'd suggest WP:AFDEQ,WP:GNG, WP:NMUSIC, and WP:AFDFORMAT. You seem to not understand what it takes for an article to be on Wikipedia. Also,please sign your comments here and on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~). John from Idegon (talk) 08:59, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  10:19, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  10:19, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  10:19, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. No significant, independent coverage so far; if any appears, then the article can be recreated afterward. (WP:TOOSOON). Neutrality^talk 05:22, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:50, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:07, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.