- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Consensus to keep, though improvement is needed. Until(1 == 2) 18:48, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
Fairly nonnotable prog language. Was prodded in June. Prod removed without addressing the concern. "Notability" tag ignored as well. Of 1,300+ google hits (about 300 unique) I failed to find reliable third-party sources. The language itself is fairly nonoriginal. Claiming to be a Klingon programming language, it lacks the personality and iron humor of Klingon language (although the translation of Hello World does show that the author is aware of it). `'Míkka 23:44, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete per lack of reliable sourcesCorpx 05:16, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]- Comment I tried to track down some non-blog sources. [1] (SlashDot), [2] (trektoday.com). It got a mention as a possible undergraduate project at Oxford Brookes [3], and has an entry in ESR's Retrocomputing Museum [4]. (Also a snippet in NTK.net's weekly digest[5], but I'd tend to discount that one myself) --tiny plastic Grey Knight ⊖ 12:22, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep enough coverage to satisfy me. Corpx 14:43, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions. -- the wub "?!" 17:34, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep with those cites and Ghits. Bearian 23:16, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep DemanusFlint 22:00, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.