The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. (non-admin closure) Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 08:48, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vatadara (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very short, partly incoherent article. Jamesmcmahon0 (talk) 15:20, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Both issues can be addressed by edits. So based on reasons given, I would say Keep. Postcard Cathy (talk) 16:16, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:25, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.