- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 22:51, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Vaughn Frick (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject fails WP:BIO as secondary coverage is non-existent; in fact, the page reads like the subject himself wrote it; and in the edit history, the subject himself wonders why a page is being made for him and adds details from his resume without references. Yoninah (talk) 20:31, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. —Yoninah (talk) 20:38, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:SOAP/WP:RESUME since it the article reads like a resume in paragraph form, WP:VERIFY since it only has one source, and WP:COI since the article has been edited by Mr. Frick himself and since the one source provided comes from his company's website. //Gbern3 (talk) 21:03, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 02:11, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per WP:RESUME. Stuartyeates (talk) 02:24, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.