Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vector (video game)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ya sh ! 23:42, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vector (video game)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article should be deleted because it is a non-notable mobile game. There are no sources currently in the article and there is very little coverage in a Google search. -KAP03 (talk) 23:19, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The article needs to be rewritten, but there's coverage available: [1] from SocialTimes, [2] from Pocket Gamer, [3] from Slide to Play, [4] from Gamezebo, and [5] from GameSpot. The prior four are all vetted by WP:VG/RS. The first is a blog hosted by Adweek. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 10:11, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:11, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep with the sources in the article and listed above, especially GameSpot's one (as a generalist VG source and not a mobile-specific one). ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 05:16, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Could use more/better sources but game meets notability guidelines (has over 50 million downloads on Android alone). Spilia4 (talk) 08:06, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep In addition to sources provided by NinjaRobotPirate we have coverage from Eurogamer and CNET. --The1337gamer (talk) 10:55, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.