- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 18:47, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Vector Sigma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable fictional computer. No significant coverage in reliable secondary sources as mandated by the general notability guideline. Claritas § 21:00, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not notable. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 01:00, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:29, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:29, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran talk to me! 08:54, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, long and almost entirely unreferenced article loaded with POV analysis about a fictional universe with no assertion of WP:Notability. In short, it's a perfect article for the Transformers Wiki, but not an appropriate article for Wikipedia. Altered Walter (talk) 23:24, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.