Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vendor management office
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh 20:22, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Vendor management office (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Original research in not very encyclopedic language about a neologism. Essentially guerrilla spam. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 10:04, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 11:17, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep/merge This is a valid search term, see Google Scholar. It might be merged to an article such as Supply Chain Management but that is a matter of content-editing, not deletion. Colonel Warden (talk) 12:38, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete/merge per WP:SPAM and WP:NEO. Aditya(talk • contribs) 15:09, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. Another article about a three letter acronym that opens with a salvo of vague and evasive prose: over-arching organizational concept of strategically managing procurements and vendors to maximize an organization’s investment in key commodities. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 16:54, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, typical business major buzzword-filled nonsense. AnteaterZot (talk) 18:26, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- delete - This neologism has not received enough coverage to be notable. The article itself proves this point by not presenting reliable sources to back its claims.⇨ EconomistBR ⇦ Talk 20:09, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As per nom.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:16, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.