Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vengeance of lazarus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete--Tone 20:58, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vengeance of lazarus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Contested Declined speedy deletion ... group has not yet released an album on a major label ... no WP:RS coverage ... only citation is their MySpace page ... also nominate their yet-to-be-released album, Vengeance of Lazarus (album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) — The Bipolar Anon-IP Gnome (talk) 12:32, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 13:18, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note, article asserts their label is Roadrunner Records, which is distributed by Warner Music Group. Also please note, as the reviewing admin I didn't "contest" the CSD tag for speedy deletion, I declined it. Gwen Gale (talk) 13:19, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • My bad ... PRODs are "contested", CSDs are "declined". :-) — The Bipolar Anon-IP Gnome (talk) 02:36, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

:) And when they get declined, it's often a hint AfD should indeed be the next stop. Gwen Gale (talk) 11:09, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Keep Googling it does find some coverage outside of the MySpace page. However, the article should be renamed Bengeance of Lazarus for proper capitalization. If someone wants to look at what they find on Google (I will later) and review whether or not they are valid sources, that would be good. DavidWS (talk) 13:23, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:22, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. They don't have their first album out yet, and I couldn't find any significant coverage from a Google search.--Michig (talk) 16:28, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:MUSIC; no evidence of notability. The article for their to-be-released album Vengeance of Lazarus (album) should also be deleted on similar grounds. Murtoa (talk) 21:37, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Spam --Michael Johnson (talk) 01:11, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No releases, no references, just another non-notable group per WP:BAND. WWGB (talk) 11:01, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.